[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250306151654.GA22810@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:16:54 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@...ux.ibm.com>,
John Meneghini <jmeneghi@...hat.com>, bmarzins@...hat.com,
Bryan Gurney <bgurney@...hat.com>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marco Patalano <mpatalan@...hat.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: remove multipath module parameter
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:01:19AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > If the device is indeed entirely single ported and Samsung can confirm
> > the setting is incorret and not easily fixable by a firmware update
> > we can quirk it.
>
> It's not one vendor or device.
I've not seen in in the wild so it can't be that common.
> Or consider a true multiport PCIe where each port connects to a
> different host. Each host sees a single port so they're not using
> multipath capabilities, and the admin wants the MD behavior that removes
> a disk on hot plug. Or even if one host sees both paths of a multiport
> PCIe, they still might want that hot plug behavior. The module parameter
> makes that possible, so some equivalent should be available before
> removing it.
A module-wide parameter is absolutely the wrong way to configure it.
You'd ad best want it per-controller or even per-namespace. One
tradeoff would be to disable the multipath code for private namespaces,
although that would cause problems when rescanning changes the flag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists