[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8m-vJ6mP1Sh2pt3@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 07:26:52 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Sooyong Suk <s.suk@...sung.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
jaewon31.kim@...il.com, spssyr@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] block, fs: use FOLL_LONGTERM as gup_flags for direct
IO
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:40:56PM +0900, Sooyong Suk wrote:
> There are GUP references to pages that are serving as direct IO buffers.
> Those pages can be allocated from CMA pageblocks despite they can be
> pinned until the DIO is completed.
direct I/O is eactly the case that is not FOLL_LONGTERM and one of
the reasons to even have the flag. So big fat no to this.
You also completely failed to address the relevant mailinglist and
maintainers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists