[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dabc5fd13900935287a3b187d0d2cac2f2920dd4.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:41:13 +0100
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jason
Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens
<hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/pci: Fix dev.dma_range_map missing sentinel element
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 16:25 +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> The fixed commit sets up dev.dma_range_map but missed that this is
> supposed to be an array of struct bus_dma_region with a sentinel element
> with the size field set to 0 at the end. This would lead to overruns in
> e.g. dma_range_map_min(). It could also result in wrong translations
> instead of DMA_MAPPIN_ERROR in translate_phys_to_dma() if the paddr were
> to not fit in the aperture. Fix this by using the dma_direct_set_offset()
> helper which creates a sentinel for us.
>
> Fixes: d236843a6964 ("s390/pci: store DMA offset in bus_dma_region")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> This is based on iommu/next which contains the fixed commit
> ---
> arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> index 0e725039861f92925a38f7ff7cb6de6b0d965ac3..14310c3b48860a16de13536adf95ef99e6af21cc 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> @@ -287,23 +287,21 @@ static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_alloc(int topo, bool topo_is_tid)
> static void pci_dma_range_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
> - struct bus_dma_region *map;
> - u64 aligned_end;
> + u64 aligned_end, size;
> + dma_addr_t dma_start;
> + int ret;
>
> - map = kzalloc(sizeof(*map), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!map)
> - return;
> -
> - map->cpu_start = 0;
> - map->dma_start = PAGE_ALIGN(zdev->start_dma);
> + dma_start = PAGE_ALIGN(zdev->start_dma);
> aligned_end = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(zdev->end_dma + 1);
> - if (aligned_end >= map->dma_start)
> - map->size = aligned_end - map->dma_start;
> + if (aligned_end >= dma_start)
> + size = aligned_end - dma_start;
> else
> - map->size = 0;
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(map->size == 0);
> + size = 0;
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(size == 0);
>
> - pdev->dev.dma_range_map = map;
> + ret = dma_direct_set_offset(&pdev->dev, 0, dma_start, size);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("Failed to allocate DMA range map for %s\n", pci_name(pdev));
Arguably one might want to use dev_err() here but the rest of the file
uses pr_err(). On the other hand dma_direct_set_offset() uses dev_err()
in case there is already a dev.dma_range_map.
Also maybe s/allocate/set up/ since we're not checking just for -ENOMEM
> }
>
> void pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> ---
> base-commit: e840414e5a73ac02ffba6299b46f535a0b7cba98
> change-id: 20250306-fix_dma_map_alloc-b3b05903dcfb
>
> Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists