lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61636d83-8154-4e7b-850b-1c4ed9a2c2f2@t-8ch.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:00:17 +0100
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Louis Taylor <louis@...gniz.eu>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] tools/nolibc: mark more test functions as static

On 2025-03-04 07:58:19+0000, Louis Taylor wrote:
> It was mentioned that a new test_ function should be static, so go back
> over existing functions and mark those static as well.

Actually Willy wants these non-static for debugging purposes.
I can't seem to get that into my head -.-
Let's drop this one.

> Signed-off-by: Louis Taylor <louis@...gniz.eu>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> index 2a1629938dd6..b5464ca8d050 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int test_dirent(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -int test_getpagesize(void)
> +static int test_getpagesize(void)
>  {
>  	int x = getpagesize();
>  	int c;
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ int test_getpagesize(void)
>  	return !c;
>  }
>  
> -int test_fork(void)
> +static int test_fork(void)
>  {
>  	int status;
>  	pid_t pid;
> @@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ int test_fork(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -int test_stat_timestamps(void)
> +static int test_stat_timestamps(void)
>  {
>  	struct stat st;
>  
> @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ int test_stat_timestamps(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -int test_uname(void)
> +static int test_uname(void)
>  {
>  	struct utsname buf;
>  	char osrelease[sizeof(buf.release)];
> @@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ int test_uname(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -int test_mmap_munmap(void)
> +static int test_mmap_munmap(void)
>  {
>  	int ret, fd, i, page_size;
>  	void *mem;
> @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ int test_mmap_munmap(void)
>  	return !!ret;
>  }
>  
> -int test_pipe(void)
> +static int test_pipe(void)
>  {
>  	const char *const msg = "hello, nolibc";
>  	int pipefd[2];
> @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ int test_pipe(void)
>  	return !!memcmp(buf, msg, len);
>  }
>  
> -int test_rlimit(void)
> +static int test_rlimit(void)
>  {
>  	struct rlimit rlim = {
>  		.rlim_cur = 1 << 20,
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ