[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250306174442.GHZ8nfCiXOJj_fnQa7@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:44:42 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, nik.borisov@...e.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/147] 6.6.81-rc2 review
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:59:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 20:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.81 release.
> > There are 147 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 08 Mar 2025 15:13:38 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.81-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Regressions on i386 the defconfig builds failed with clang-20
> and gcc-13 the stable-rc 6.6.81-rc2.
>
> First seen on the
> Good: v6.6.78
> Bad: v6.6.78-442-g8f0527d547fe
>
> * i386 build
> - clang-20-defconfig
> - clang-nightly-defconfig
> - gcc-13-defconfig
> - gcc-8-defconfig
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? Yes
> - Reproducibility? Yes
>
> Build regression: i386 microcode core.c use of undeclared identifier
> 'initrd_start_early'
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> ## Build log
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c:198:11: error: use of undeclared
> identifier 'initrd_start_early'; did you mean 'initrd_start'?
> 198 | start = initrd_start_early;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | initrd_start
> include/linux/initrd.h:18:22: note: 'initrd_start' declared here
> 18 | extern unsigned long initrd_start, initrd_end;
> | ^
> 1 error generated.
Looks like we need:
4c585af7180c ("x86/boot/32: Temporarily map initrd for microcode loading")
after all. Stupid 32-bit sh*t.
Greg, ontop of what do you want this backported? Or should I send you a whole
set again with this patch in the right spot and you can apply the whole set
again?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists