[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025030633-deserve-postcard-9ed7@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 19:01:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, nik.borisov@...e.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/147] 6.6.81-rc2 review
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:44:42PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:59:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 20:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.81 release.
> > > There are 147 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sat, 08 Mar 2025 15:13:38 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.81-rc2.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> >
> > Regressions on i386 the defconfig builds failed with clang-20
> > and gcc-13 the stable-rc 6.6.81-rc2.
> >
> > First seen on the
> > Good: v6.6.78
> > Bad: v6.6.78-442-g8f0527d547fe
> >
> > * i386 build
> > - clang-20-defconfig
> > - clang-nightly-defconfig
> > - gcc-13-defconfig
> > - gcc-8-defconfig
> >
> > Regression Analysis:
> > - New regression? Yes
> > - Reproducibility? Yes
> >
> > Build regression: i386 microcode core.c use of undeclared identifier
> > 'initrd_start_early'
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >
> > ## Build log
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c:198:11: error: use of undeclared
> > identifier 'initrd_start_early'; did you mean 'initrd_start'?
> > 198 | start = initrd_start_early;
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | initrd_start
> > include/linux/initrd.h:18:22: note: 'initrd_start' declared here
> > 18 | extern unsigned long initrd_start, initrd_end;
> > | ^
> > 1 error generated.
>
> Looks like we need:
>
> 4c585af7180c ("x86/boot/32: Temporarily map initrd for microcode loading")
>
> after all. Stupid 32-bit sh*t.
>
> Greg, ontop of what do you want this backported? Or should I send you a whole
> set again with this patch in the right spot and you can apply the whole set
> again?
Let me see if that backports cleanly...
Nope.
A backported version would be great. If you want to just send me a
single patch, or a whole new bundle, anything will work, whatever is
easier for you.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists