linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.15] sched_ext: Enhance built-in idle selection with preferred CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z8nwU3C-WiWN7eia@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:58:27 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.15] sched_ext: Enhance built-in idle
 selection with preferred CPUs

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:54:34PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Just to make sure I understand, you mean provide two separate kfuncs:
> scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() and scx_bpf_select_cpu_pref(), instead of
> introducing the flag?

Oh I meant just having scx_bpf_select_cpu_and(). The caller can just call it
twice for _pref() behavior, right?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun