[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67ca0fdbeaad8_1a7729486@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 13:12:59 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "Ira
Weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Dave Jiang
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Gregory Price
<gourry@...rry.net>, "Fabio M. De Francesco"
<fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>, Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/14] cxl/acpi: Unify CFMWS memory log messages with
SRAT messages
Robert Richter wrote:
> CFMWS entries have a similar importance as SRAT table entries to
> describe memory regions. For CXL error analysis and memory debugging
> information of both is needed. Unify output of both messages to
> improve logging. Change the style of CFMWS message according to SRAT
> output. Also, turn messages into a dev_info() same as for SRAT.
>
> SRAT pr_info() for reference:
>
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c:
> pr_info("SRAT: Node %u PXM %u [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]%s%s\n",
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
NAK on this one. If you want to add this print the best place would be
in acpi_parse_cfmws() so that it can include the PXM information and be
independent of the cxl_acpi module loading.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists