linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH clocksource] Defer marking clocksources unstable to kthread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871pva5zww.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 09:25:19 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: paulmck@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jstultz@...gle.com, sboyd@...nel.org, christian@...sel.eu,
 kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH clocksource] Defer marking clocksources unstable to kthread

Paul!

On Wed, Mar 05 2025 at 09:43, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

I'm pretty sure, that I pointed this out to you before:

   "[PATCH subsys] Short description"

is not a valid subject line.

The canonical and documented form is:

   [PATCH] subsys: Short description

Can you please stop making your own rules and thereby breaking the
automated workflow of people so they have to manually fix up your stuff?

Thanks,

        tglx