lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc38d0fc-0e3e-4196-b698-1528dc57421e@flourine.local>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 11:06:03 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>, 
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>, 
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] nvmet-fcloop: add ref counting to lport

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:26:40AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> There is nothing which updates the ctrl in nvme_fc_unregister_localport.
> Not really sure what to do here. fcloop obviously is now behaving
> differently to the hw drivers. But still, this looks very fragile that
> there is no sort of synchronization between port unregistration and ctrl
> state.

Ah I see what's supposed to happen in this scenario.
nvme_fc_unregister_localport will return -EINVAL when the port is still
in use. That means fcloop is not allowed to pull the rug yet.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ