[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250306123245.GE19868@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 13:32:46 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@...vas.dk>, Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com,
Ananth.narayan@....com, Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] treewide: pipe: Convert all references to
pipe->{head,tail,max_usage,ring_size} to unsigned short
On 03/06, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>
> @@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> */
> for (;;) {
> /* Read ->head with a barrier vs post_one_notification() */
> - unsigned int head = smp_load_acquire(&pipe->head);
> - unsigned int tail = pipe->tail;
> - unsigned int mask = pipe->ring_size - 1;
> + unsigned short head = smp_load_acquire(&pipe->head);
> + unsigned short tail = pipe->tail;
> + unsigned short mask = pipe->ring_size - 1;
I dunno... but if we do this, perhaps we should
s/unsigned int/pipe_index_t instead?
At least this would be more grep friendly.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists