[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8maRNYsn1LzjryX@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 12:51:16 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 09/13] net: phylink: Use phy_caps_lookup for
fixed-link configuration
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:12:20AM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 09:56:32 +0100
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 3/3/25 10:03 AM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > > @@ -879,8 +880,10 @@ static int phylink_parse_fixedlink(struct phylink *pl,
> > > linkmode_copy(pl->link_config.advertising, pl->supported);
> > > phylink_validate(pl, pl->supported, &pl->link_config);
> > >
> > > - s = phy_lookup_setting(pl->link_config.speed, pl->link_config.duplex,
> > > - pl->supported, true);
> > > + c = phy_caps_lookup(pl->link_config.speed, pl->link_config.duplex,
> > > + pl->supported, true);
> > > + if (c)
> > > + linkmode_and(match, pl->supported, c->linkmodes);
> >
> > How about using only the first bit from `c->linkmodes`, to avoid
> > behavior changes?
>
> If what we want is to keep the exact same behaviour, then we need to
> go one step further and make sure we keep the same one as before, and
> it's not guaranteed that the first bit in c->linkmodes is this one.
>
> We could however have a default supported mask for fixed-link in phylink
> that contains all the linkmodes we allow for fixed links, then filter
> with the lookup, something like :
>
>
> - linkmode_fill(pl->supported);
> + /* (in a dedicated helper) Linkmodes reported for fixed links below
> + * 10G */
> + linkmode_zero(pl->supported);
> +
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Half_BIT, pl->supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Full_BIT, pl->supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Half_BIT, pl->supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT, pl->supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT, pl->supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT, pl->supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_2500baseT_Full_BIT, pl->supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_5000baseT_Full_BIT, pl->supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseT_Full_BIT, pl->supported);
Good idea, but do we have some way to automatically generate the baseT
link modes?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists