[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef29ceb3-9aa6-f4ca-014e-3f005a9b4beb@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:06:31 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: Add Extended Tag + MRRS quirk for Xeon 6
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:51:08PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Disallow Extended Tags and Max Read Request Size (MRRS) larger than
> > 128B for devices under Xeon 6 Root Ports if the Root Port is bifurcated
> > to x2. Also, 10-Bit Tag Requester should be disallowed for device
> > underneath these Root Ports but there is currently no 10-Bit Tag
> > support in the kernel.
> >
> > The normal path that writes MRRS is through
> > pcie_bus_configure_settings() -> pcie_bus_configure_set() ->
> > pcie_write_mrrs() and contains a few early returns that are based on
> > the value of pcie_bus_config. Overriding such checks with the host
> > bridge flag check on each level seems messy. Thus, simply ensure MRRS
> > is always written in pci_configure_device() if a device requiring the
> > quirk is detected.
>
> This is kind of weird. It's apparently not an erratum in the sense
> that something doesn't *work*, just something for "optimized PCIe
> performance"?
>
> What are we supposed to do with this? Add similar quirks for every
> random PCI controller? Scratching my head about what this means for
> the future.
>
> What bad things happen if we *don't* do this? Is this something we
> could/should rely on BIOS to configure for us?
Even if BIOS configures this (I'm under impression they already do, I
had problem in finding a configuration in our lab on which this patch
had some effect). But my kernel was built with CONFIG_PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT, if
I set that to CONFIG_PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE, what BIOS did will be
overwritten.
One option would be to drop the changes to drivers/pci/probe.c which is
there to force MRRS is always written (in this v1). That case should be
coverable with BIOS configuration but changes into pcie_set_readrq() seems
necessary to prevent Linux overwriting the configuration made by the BIOS.
Unless there's going to some other mechanism to tell kernel it should keep
hands from from these values as suggested by Dan.
--
i.
> > Link: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/837176
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > The normal path that writes MRRS is somewhat convoluted so I ensure MRRS
> > gets written in a more direct way, I'm not sure if that's the best
> > approach. Thus sending this as RFC.
> >
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> > drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 +++++++-
> > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index 869d204a70a3..81ddad81ccb8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -5913,7 +5913,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcie_get_readrq);
> > int pcie_set_readrq(struct pci_dev *dev, int rq)
> > {
> > u16 v;
> > - int ret;
> > + int ret, max_mrrs = 4096;
> > struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
> >
> > if (rq < 128 || rq > 4096 || !is_power_of_2(rq))
> > @@ -5933,13 +5933,14 @@ int pcie_set_readrq(struct pci_dev *dev, int rq)
> >
> > v = FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ, ffs(rq) - 8);
> >
> > - if (bridge->no_inc_mrrs) {
> > - int max_mrrs = pcie_get_readrq(dev);
> > + if (bridge->no_inc_mrrs)
> > + max_mrrs = pcie_get_readrq(dev);
> > + if (bridge->only_128b_mrrs)
> > + max_mrrs = 128;
> >
> > - if (rq > max_mrrs) {
> > - pci_info(dev, "can't set Max_Read_Request_Size to %d; max is %d\n", rq, max_mrrs);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > + if (rq > max_mrrs) {
> > + pci_info(dev, "can't set Max_Read_Request_Size to %d; max is %d\n", rq, max_mrrs);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > ret = pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index b6536ed599c3..ceaa34b0525b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -2342,7 +2342,11 @@ static void pci_configure_serr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >
> > static void pci_configure_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > + struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
> > +
> > pci_configure_mps(dev);
> > + if (host_bridge && host_bridge->only_128b_mrrs)
> > + pcie_set_readrq(dev, 128);
> > pci_configure_extended_tags(dev, NULL);
> > pci_configure_relaxed_ordering(dev);
> > pci_configure_ltr(dev);
> > @@ -2851,13 +2855,15 @@ static void pcie_write_mps(struct pci_dev *dev, int mps)
> >
> > static void pcie_write_mrrs(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > + struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
> > int rc, mrrs;
> >
> > /*
> > * In the "safe" case, do not configure the MRRS. There appear to be
> > * issues with setting MRRS to 0 on a number of devices.
> > */
> > - if (pcie_bus_config != PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE)
> > + if (pcie_bus_config != PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE &&
> > + (!host_bridge || !host_bridge->only_128b_mrrs))
> > return;
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > index b84ff7bade82..987cd94028e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > @@ -5564,6 +5564,33 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, 0x0144, quirk_no_ext_tags);
> > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, 0x0420, quirk_no_ext_tags);
> > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, 0x0422, quirk_no_ext_tags);
> >
> > +static void quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus);
> > + u32 linkcap;
> > +
> > + if (!bridge)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &linkcap);
> > + if (FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW, linkcap) != 0x2)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + bridge->no_ext_tags = 1;
> > + bridge->only_128b_mrrs = 1;
> > + pci_info(pdev, "Disabling Extended Tags and forcing MRRS to 128B (performance reasons due to 2x PCIe link)\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0db0, quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs);
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0db1, quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs);
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0db2, quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs);
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0db3, quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs);
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0db6, quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs);
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0db7, quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs);
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0db8, quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs);
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0db9, quirk_pcie2x_no_tags_no_mrrs);
> > +
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_ATS
> > static void quirk_no_ats(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index 47b31ad724fa..def29c8c0f84 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
> > unsigned int ignore_reset_delay:1; /* For entire hierarchy */
> > unsigned int no_ext_tags:1; /* No Extended Tags */
> > unsigned int no_inc_mrrs:1; /* No Increase MRRS */
> > + unsigned int only_128b_mrrs:1; /* Only 128B MRRS */
> > unsigned int native_aer:1; /* OS may use PCIe AER */
> > unsigned int native_pcie_hotplug:1; /* OS may use PCIe hotplug */
> > unsigned int native_shpc_hotplug:1; /* OS may use SHPC hotplug */
> >
> > base-commit: 2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b
> > --
> > 2.39.5
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists