[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250307134933.1033872-6-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 08:49:29 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] bcachefs: Fix btree_node_scan io_ref handling
This was completely fubar; it's now simplified a bit as well.
Note that for_each_online_member() takes and releases io_refs as it
iterates, so we need to release that if we break.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
---
fs/bcachefs/btree_node_scan.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/btree_node_scan.c b/fs/bcachefs/btree_node_scan.c
index fb73ec77c099..678161321e42 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/btree_node_scan.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/btree_node_scan.c
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int read_btree_nodes_worker(void *p)
err:
bio_put(bio);
free_page((unsigned long) buf);
- percpu_ref_get(&ca->io_ref);
+ percpu_ref_put(&ca->io_ref);
closure_put(w->cl);
kfree(w);
return 0;
@@ -289,29 +289,28 @@ static int read_btree_nodes(struct find_btree_nodes *f)
continue;
struct find_btree_nodes_worker *w = kmalloc(sizeof(*w), GFP_KERNEL);
- struct task_struct *t;
-
if (!w) {
percpu_ref_put(&ca->io_ref);
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err;
}
- percpu_ref_get(&ca->io_ref);
- closure_get(&cl);
w->cl = &cl;
w->f = f;
w->ca = ca;
- t = kthread_run(read_btree_nodes_worker, w, "read_btree_nodes/%s", ca->name);
+ struct task_struct *t = kthread_create(read_btree_nodes_worker, w, "read_btree_nodes/%s", ca->name);
ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(t);
if (ret) {
percpu_ref_put(&ca->io_ref);
- closure_put(&cl);
- f->ret = ret;
- bch_err(c, "error starting kthread: %i", ret);
+ kfree(w);
+ bch_err_msg(c, ret, "starting kthread");
break;
}
+
+ closure_get(&cl);
+ percpu_ref_get(&ca->io_ref);
+ wake_up_process(t);
}
err:
closure_sync(&cl);
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists