linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] s390: mv s390 sysctls into their own file under arch/s390 dir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250307152620.9880F75-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:26:20 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: joel granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] s390: mv s390 sysctls into their own file under
 arch/s390 dir

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:29:46PM +0100, joel granados wrote:
> Move s390 sysctls (spin_retry and userprocess_debug) into their own
> files under arch/s390. We create two new sysctl tables
> (2390_{fault,spin}_sysctl_table) which will be initialized with
> arch_initcall placing them after their original place in proc_root_init.
> 
> This is part of a greater effort to move ctl tables into their
> respective subsystems which will reduce the merge conflicts in
> kernel/sysctl.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: joel granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/s390/mm/fault.c     | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sysctl.c          | 18 ------------------
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>

How should this go upstream? Will you take care of this, or should
this go via the s390 tree?