[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250307153015.GF8350@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 07:30:15 -0800
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Manuel Fombuena <fombuena@...look.com>
Cc: pavel@....cz, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] leds: Kconfig: leds-st1202: add select for required
LEDS_TRIGGER_PATTERN
On Fri, 07 Mar 2025, Manuel Fombuena wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025, Manuel Fombuena wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> > > @@ -971,6 +971,7 @@ config LEDS_ST1202
> > > depends on I2C
> > > depends on OF
> > > select LEDS_TRIGGERS
> > > + select LEDS_TRIGGER_PATTERN
> >
> > Don't you need both?
>
> Not sure I understand the question, sorry. The patch adds 'select
> LEDS_TRIGGER_PATTERN' to the existing 'select LEDS_TRIGGERS'. So yes, you
> need both.
>
> If the question were meant to be 'Do you need both?' the answer would have
> also been yes. Having only 'select LEDS_TRIGGER_PATTERN' doesn't select
> LEDS_TRIGGERS, and it would be even worse because you wouldn't have any of
> them. I tried that first, in case select LEDS_TRIGGER_PATTERN implicitly
> selects LEDS_TRIGGER, but it doesn't work like that.
Never mind. I misread the diff.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists