[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80da4df1-cd35-469b-a636-8f405358ef00@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:39:43 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Steam Lin <stlin2@...bond.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/21] mtd: spinand: Use more specific naming for the
write enable/disable op
On 3/7/25 3:08 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> -#define SPINAND_WR_EN_DIS_OP(enable) \
> +#define SPINAND_WR_EN_DIS_1S_0_0_OP(enable) \
> SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD((enable) ? 0x06 : 0x04, 1), \
> SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR, \
> SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY, \
here too, I lean towards keeping the name as it was, but maybe others
can jump in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists