[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250307163409.13491-2-a.sadovnikov@ispras.ru>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:34:09 +0000
From: Artem Sadovnikov <a.sadovnikov@...ras.ru>
To: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Artem Sadovnikov <a.sadovnikov@...ras.ru>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] jffs2: check that raw node were preallocated before writing summary
Syzkaller detected a kernel bug in jffs2_link_node_ref, caused by fault
injection in jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs. jffs2_sum_write_sumnode doesn't
check return value of jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs and simply lets any
error propagate into jffs2_sum_write_data, which eventually calls
jffs2_link_node_ref in order to link the summary to an expectedly allocated
node.
kernel BUG at fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 1 PID: 31277 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.1.128-syzkaller-00139-ge10f83ca10a1 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:jffs2_link_node_ref+0x570/0x690 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592
Call Trace:
<TASK>
jffs2_sum_write_data fs/jffs2/summary.c:841 [inline]
jffs2_sum_write_sumnode+0xd1a/0x1da0 fs/jffs2/summary.c:874
jffs2_do_reserve_space+0xa18/0xd60 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:388
jffs2_reserve_space+0x55f/0xaa0 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:197
jffs2_write_inode_range+0x246/0xb50 fs/jffs2/write.c:362
jffs2_write_end+0x726/0x15d0 fs/jffs2/file.c:301
generic_perform_write+0x314/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3856
__generic_file_write_iter+0x2ae/0x4d0 mm/filemap.c:3973
generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350 mm/filemap.c:4005
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2265 [inline]
do_iter_readv_writev+0x20f/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:735
do_iter_write+0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861
vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902
iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685
do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763 [inline]
direct_splice_actor+0x10c/0x170 fs/splice.c:950
splice_direct_to_actor+0x337/0xa10 fs/splice.c:896
do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002
do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0 fs/read_write.c:1255
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1323 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Fix this issue by checking return value of jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs
before calling jffs2_sum_write_data.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 2f785402f39b ("[JFFS2] Reduce visibility of raw_node_ref to upper layers of JFFS2 code.")
Signed-off-by: Artem Sadovnikov <a.sadovnikov@...ras.ru>
---
fs/jffs2/summary.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/summary.c b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
index 4fe64519870f1..d83372d3e1a07 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/summary.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
@@ -858,7 +858,10 @@ int jffs2_sum_write_sumnode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
jeb = c->nextblock;
- jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs(c, jeb, 1);
+ ret = jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs(c, jeb, 1);
+
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
if (!c->summary->sum_num || !c->summary->sum_list_head) {
JFFS2_WARNING("Empty summary info!!!\n");
@@ -872,6 +875,8 @@ int jffs2_sum_write_sumnode(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
datasize += padsize;
ret = jffs2_sum_write_data(c, jeb, infosize, datasize, padsize);
+
+out:
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists