lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250307174001.242794-8-ziy@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri,  7 Mar 2025 12:40:00 -0500
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
	Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 7/8] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate operation

Instead of splitting the large folio uniformly during truncation, try to
use buddy allocator like folio_split() at the start and the end of a
truncation range to minimize the number of resulting folios if it is
supported. try_folio_split() is introduced to use folio_split() if
supported and it falls back to uniform split otherwise.

For example, to truncate a order-4 folio
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ..., 15]
between [3, 10] (inclusive), folio_split() splits the folio at 3 to
[0,1], [2], [3], [4..7], [8..15] and [3], [4..7] can be dropped and
[8..15] is kept with zeros in [8..10], then another folio_split() is
done at 10, so [8..10] can be dropped.

One possible optimization is to make folio_split() to split a folio based
on a given range, like [3..10] above.  But that complicates folio_split(),
so it will be investigated when necessary.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250226210032.2044041-8-ziy@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shuemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
 include/linux/huge_mm.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/huge_memory.c        |  6 +++---
 mm/truncate.c           | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index e57e811cfd3c..e893d546a49f 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -345,6 +345,36 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
 		unsigned int new_order);
 int min_order_for_split(struct folio *folio);
 int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
+bool uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
+		bool warns);
+bool non_uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
+		bool warns);
+int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order, struct page *page,
+		struct list_head *list);
+/*
+ * try_folio_split - try to split a @folio at @page using non uniform split.
+ * @folio: folio to be split
+ * @page: split to order-0 at the given page
+ * @list: store the after-split folios
+ *
+ * Try to split a @folio at @page using non uniform split to order-0, if
+ * non uniform split is not supported, fall back to uniform split.
+ *
+ * Return: 0: split is successful, otherwise split failed.
+ */
+static inline int try_folio_split(struct folio *folio, struct page *page,
+		struct list_head *list)
+{
+	int ret = min_order_for_split(folio);
+
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!non_uniform_split_supported(folio, 0, false))
+		return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list,
+				ret);
+	return folio_split(folio, ret, page, list);
+}
 static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
@@ -537,6 +567,12 @@ static inline int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *lis
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int try_folio_split(struct folio *folio, struct page *page,
+		struct list_head *list)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped) {}
 #define split_huge_pmd(__vma, __pmd, __address)	\
 	do { } while (0)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index d44b6d4b7f32..8a42150298de 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3648,7 +3648,7 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool non_uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
+bool non_uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
 		bool warns)
 {
 	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
@@ -3680,7 +3680,7 @@ static bool non_uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_or
 }
 
 /* See comments in non_uniform_split_supported() */
-static bool uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
+bool uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
 		bool warns)
 {
 	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
@@ -3999,7 +3999,7 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
  *
  * After split, folio is left locked for caller.
  */
-static int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
+int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
 		struct page *split_at, struct list_head *list)
 {
 	return __folio_split(folio, new_order, split_at, &folio->page, list,
diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
index 0395e578d946..0790b6227512 100644
--- a/mm/truncate.c
+++ b/mm/truncate.c
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ bool truncate_inode_partial_folio(struct folio *folio, loff_t start, loff_t end)
 {
 	loff_t pos = folio_pos(folio);
 	unsigned int offset, length;
+	struct page *split_at, *split_at2;
 
 	if (pos < start)
 		offset = start - pos;
@@ -221,8 +222,42 @@ bool truncate_inode_partial_folio(struct folio *folio, loff_t start, loff_t end)
 		folio_invalidate(folio, offset, length);
 	if (!folio_test_large(folio))
 		return true;
-	if (split_folio(folio) == 0)
+
+	split_at = folio_page(folio, PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(offset) / PAGE_SIZE);
+	split_at2 = folio_page(folio,
+			PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(offset + length) / PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	if (!try_folio_split(folio, split_at, NULL)) {
+		/*
+		 * try to split at offset + length to make sure folios within
+		 * the range can be dropped, especially to avoid memory waste
+		 * for shmem truncate
+		 */
+		struct folio *folio2 = page_folio(split_at2);
+
+		if (!folio_try_get(folio2))
+			goto no_split;
+
+		if (!folio_test_large(folio2))
+			goto out;
+
+		if (!folio_trylock(folio2))
+			goto out;
+
+		/*
+		 * make sure folio2 is large and does not change its mapping.
+		 * Its split result does not matter here.
+		 */
+		if (folio_test_large(folio2) &&
+		    folio2->mapping == folio->mapping)
+			try_folio_split(folio2, split_at2, NULL);
+
+		folio_unlock(folio2);
+out:
+		folio_put(folio2);
+no_split:
 		return true;
+	}
 	if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
 		return false;
 	truncate_inode_folio(folio->mapping, folio);
-- 
2.47.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ