[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8swXUGf9rtTHw1o@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 19:43:57 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] bits: Fixed-type GENMASK_U*() and BIT_U*()
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:18:02PM -0500, Yury Norov wrote:
> No rush, please allow your reviewers a week or two before submitting
> a new iteration unless you want to disregard the previous version for
> some reason, of course. This will not get into the upcoming merge
> window, anyways.
>
> So, what should I do? Go through the v5 and all discussions in there,
> or just jump on this?
There is also question to you. Are we going to leave with U128 variants or is
it subject to remove? If the latter, can you issue a formal patch?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists