lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efc2ee9d-5382-457f-b471-f3c44b81a190@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 18:49:56 +0000
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: hpa@...or.com
Cc: Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, airlied@...il.com,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alistair@...ple.id.au, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 andrzej.hajda@...el.com, arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com,
 awalls@...metrocast.net, bp@...en8.de, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, davem@...emloft.net, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, eajames@...ux.ibm.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 eleanor15x@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
 jernej.skrabec@...il.com, jirislaby@...nel.org, jk@...abs.org,
 joel@....id.au, johannes@...solutions.net, jonas@...boo.se,
 jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw, kuba@...nel.org, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
 linux@...musvillemoes.dk, louis.peens@...igine.com,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mchehab@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
 miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, mripard@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 parthiban.veerasooran@...rochip.com, rfoss@...nel.org, richard@....at,
 simona@...ll.ch, tglx@...utronix.de, tzimmermann@...e.de, vigneshr@...com,
 visitorckw@...il.com, x86@...nel.org, yury.norov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Introduce and use generic parity16/32/64 helper

> (int)true most definitely is guaranteed to be 1.

That's not technically correct any more.

GCC has introduced hardened bools that intentionally have bit patterns
other than 0 and 1.

https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/changes.html

~Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ