lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4z4yKRQiqMtGRr2bjvgVY6mmujdqyKyVgid=RUXr_9TbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 08:34:17 +1300
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Qun-Wei Lin <qun-wei.lin@...iatek.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, 
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, 
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, 
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, 
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, 
	Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>, Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>, 
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Casper Li <casper.li@...iatek.com>, Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>, 
	Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@...iatek.com>, James Hsu <james.hsu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve Zram by separating compression context from kswapd

On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 1:02 AM Qun-Wei Lin <qun-wei.lin@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> This patch series introduces a new mechanism called kcompressd to
> improve the efficiency of memory reclaiming in the operating system. The
> main goal is to separate the tasks of page scanning and page compression
> into distinct processes or threads, thereby reducing the load on the
> kswapd thread and enhancing overall system performance under high memory
> pressure conditions.
>
> Problem:
>  In the current system, the kswapd thread is responsible for both
>  scanning the LRU pages and compressing pages into the ZRAM. This
>  combined responsibility can lead to significant performance bottlenecks,
>  especially under high memory pressure. The kswapd thread becomes a
>  single point of contention, causing delays in memory reclaiming and
>  overall system performance degradation.
>
> Target:
>  The target of this invention is to improve the efficiency of memory
>  reclaiming. By separating the tasks of page scanning and page
>  compression into distinct processes or threads, the system can handle
>  memory pressure more effectively.

Sounds great. However, we also have a time window where folios under
writeback are kept, whereas previously, writeback was done synchronously
without your patch. This may temporarily increase memory usage until the
kept folios are re-scanned.

So, you’ve observed that folio_rotate_reclaimable() runs shortly while the
async thread completes compression? Then the kept folios are shortly
re-scanned?

>
> Patch 1:
> - Introduces 2 new feature flags, BLK_FEAT_READ_SYNCHRONOUS and
>   SWP_READ_SYNCHRONOUS_IO.
>
> Patch 2:
> - Implemented the core functionality of Kcompressd and made necessary
>   modifications to the zram driver to support it.
>
> In our handheld devices, we found that applying this mechanism under high
> memory pressure scenarios can increase the rate of pgsteal_anon per second
> by over 260% compared to the situation with only kswapd.

Sounds really great.

What compression algorithm is being used? I assume that after switching to a
different compression algorithms, the benefits will change significantly. For
example, Zstd might not show as much improvement.
How was the CPU usage ratio between page scan/unmap and compression
observed before applying this patch?

>
> Qun-Wei Lin (2):
>   mm: Split BLK_FEAT_SYNCHRONOUS and SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO into separate
>     read and write flags
>   kcompressd: Add Kcompressd for accelerated zram compression
>
>  drivers/block/brd.c             |   3 +-
>  drivers/block/zram/Kconfig      |  11 ++
>  drivers/block/zram/Makefile     |   3 +-
>  drivers/block/zram/kcompressd.c | 340 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/block/zram/kcompressd.h |  25 +++
>  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c   |  21 +-
>  drivers/nvdimm/btt.c            |   3 +-
>  drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c           |   5 +-
>  include/linux/blkdev.h          |  24 ++-
>  include/linux/swap.h            |  31 +--
>  mm/memory.c                     |   4 +-
>  mm/page_io.c                    |   6 +-
>  mm/swapfile.c                   |   7 +-
>  13 files changed, 446 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/block/zram/kcompressd.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/block/zram/kcompressd.h
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>

Thanks
Barry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ