[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2667366.Lt9SDvczpP@rjwysocki.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 20:17:19 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject:
[RFC][PATCH v0.3 4/6] PM: EM: Move CPU capacity check to
em_adjust_new_capacity()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Move the check of the CPU capacity currently stored in the energy model
against the arch_scale_cpu_capacity() value to em_adjust_new_capacity()
so it will be done regardless of where the latter is called from.
This will be useful when a new em_adjust_new_capacity() caller is added
subsequently.
While at it, move the pd local variable declaration in
em_check_capacity_update() into the loop in which it is used.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
kernel/power/energy_model.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -721,10 +721,24 @@
* Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
* are correctly calculated.
*/
-static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
+static void em_adjust_new_capacity(unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev,
struct em_perf_domain *pd)
{
+ unsigned long cpu_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
struct em_perf_table *em_table;
+ struct em_perf_state *table;
+ unsigned long em_max_perf;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ table = em_perf_state_from_pd(pd);
+ em_max_perf = table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].performance;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (em_max_perf == cpu_capacity)
+ return;
+
+ pr_debug("updating cpu%d cpu_cap=%lu old capacity=%lu\n", cpu,
+ cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
em_table = em_table_dup(pd);
if (!em_table) {
@@ -740,9 +754,6 @@
static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
{
cpumask_var_t cpu_done_mask;
- struct em_perf_state *table;
- struct em_perf_domain *pd;
- unsigned long cpu_capacity;
int cpu;
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_done_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
@@ -753,7 +764,7 @@
/* Check if CPUs capacity has changed than update EM */
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
- unsigned long em_max_perf;
+ struct em_perf_domain *pd;
struct device *dev;
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_done_mask))
@@ -776,24 +787,7 @@
cpumask_or(cpu_done_mask, cpu_done_mask,
em_span_cpus(pd));
- cpu_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- table = em_perf_state_from_pd(pd);
- em_max_perf = table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].performance;
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- /*
- * Check if the CPU capacity has been adjusted during boot
- * and trigger the update for new performance values.
- */
- if (em_max_perf == cpu_capacity)
- continue;
-
- pr_debug("updating cpu%d cpu_cap=%lu old capacity=%lu\n",
- cpu, cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
-
- em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd);
+ em_adjust_new_capacity(cpu, dev, pd);
}
free_cpumask_var(cpu_done_mask);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists