[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e3898d1-9d8d-45e1-a23e-74094a7e01a5@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:46:59 -0800
From: ross.philipson@...cle.com
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
ardb@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
luto@...capital.net, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, corbet@....net,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/19] x86: Secure Launch main header file
On 3/7/25 11:37 AM, 'Jarkko Sakkinen' via trenchboot-devel wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:25:20AM -0800, ross.philipson@...cle.com wrote:
>> On 3/6/25 9:34 PM, 'Jarkko Sakkinen' via trenchboot-devel wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:42:01AM -0800, Ross Philipson wrote:
>>>> Introduce the main Secure Launch header file used in the early SL stub
>>>> and the early setup code.
>>>
>>> Just would need a *short* description of what slaunch.h holds. I guess
>>> it holds Intel TXT micro-arhitectural data structures? Anything else?
>>
>> Later it will contain data strutures etc. to support other architectures
>> like AMD and Arm64.
>>
>>>
>>> This helps e.g. reviewers to skip some but still keep on track what a
>>> patch contains (and return back to it when necessary).
>>
>> Yes we can make it clearer what is in this header file.
>
> As per code changes I did spend two hours reading them just to make sure
> that I can understand the TPM specific code changes, and also that they
> make total sense to me.
>
> Therefore I've put a lot the nagging is around documentation and
> definitions. I really could not find anything in the source code that I
> could pinpoint being absolutely wrong.
Yes agreed.
>
> This really needs just now the stamp from tip maintainers. As per TPM
> changes they do have my blessing (no need for reviewed-by's as they
> have SOB already). I hereby also give permission to pull TPM changes
> through tip tree...
Thank you for that, we appreciate it.
Ross
>
>> Thanks
>> Ross
>
> BR, Jarkko
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists