linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] crypto: ccp: Abort doing SEV INIT if SNP INIT fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fefc1f1f-fc06-a69b-3820-0180a1e597ce@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 14:57:46 -0600
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>, seanjc@...gle.com,
 pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
 john.allen@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: michael.roth@....com, dionnaglaze@...gle.com, nikunj@....com,
 ardb@...nel.org, kevinloughlin@...gle.com, Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com,
 aik@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] crypto: ccp: Abort doing SEV INIT if SNP INIT
 fails

On 3/7/25 14:54, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 3/6/25 17:09, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
>>
>> If SNP host support (SYSCFG.SNPEn) is set, then RMP table must be
> 
> s/RMP/the RMP/
> 
>> initialized up before calling SEV INIT.
> 
> s/up//
> 
>>
>> In other words, if SNP_INIT(_EX) is not issued or fails then
>> SEV INIT will fail once SNP host support (SYSCFG.SNPEn) is enabled.
> 
> s/once/if/
> 
>>
>> Fixes: 1ca5614b84eed ("crypto: ccp: Add support to initialize the AMD-SP for SEV-SNP")
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c | 7 ++-----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> index 2e87ca0e292a..a0e3de94704e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> @@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ static int __sev_snp_init_locked(int *error)
>>  	if (!sev_version_greater_or_equal(SNP_MIN_API_MAJOR, SNP_MIN_API_MINOR)) {
>>  		dev_dbg(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP support requires firmware version >= %d:%d\n",
>>  			SNP_MIN_API_MAJOR, SNP_MIN_API_MINOR);
>> -		return 0;
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	/* SNP_INIT requires MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA to be cleared on all CPUs. */
>> @@ -1325,12 +1325,9 @@ static int _sev_platform_init_locked(struct sev_platform_init_args *args)
>>  	 */
>>  	rc = __sev_snp_init_locked(&args->error);
>>  	if (rc && rc != -ENODEV) {
> 
> Can we get ride of this extra -ENODEV check? It can only be returned
> because of the same check that is made earlier in this function so it
> doesn't really serve any purpose from what I can tell.
> 
> Just make this "if (rc) {"

My bad... -ENODEV is returned if cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP) is
false, never mind.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>> -		/*
>> -		 * Don't abort the probe if SNP INIT failed,
>> -		 * continue to initialize the legacy SEV firmware.
>> -		 */
>>  		dev_err(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP: failed to INIT rc %d, error %#x\n",
>>  			rc, args->error);
>> +		return rc;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	/* Defer legacy SEV/SEV-ES support if allowed by caller/module. */