linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH iwl-net] igc: Fix XSK queue NAPI ID mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d3bafbc-eb45-49c5-be78-cec96be52f82@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 13:37:35 -0800
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, <florian@...deka.de>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>,
	<avigailx.dahan@...el.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov
	<ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Jesper Dangaard
 Brouer" <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	"Przemek Kitszel" <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn
	<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] igc: Fix XSK queue NAPI ID mapping



On 3/6/2025 10:31 AM, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> On 3/6/2025 8:45 AM, Joe Damato wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:27:38PM +0100, florian@...deka.de wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>> Btw: I got this patch via stable. It doesn't make sense to send it
>>> to stable where this patch does not apply.
>>
>> Maybe I made a mistake, but as far as I can tell the commit under
>> fixes is in 6.14-rc*:
>>
>> $ git tag --contains b65969856d4f
>> v6.14-rc1
>> v6.14-rc2
>> v6.14-rc3
>> v6.14-rc4
>>
>> So, I think this change is:
>>    - Correct
>>    - Definitely a "fixes" and should go to iwl-net
>>    - But maybe does not need to CC stable ?
>>
>> If the Intel folks would like me to resend with some change please
>> let me know.
> 
> Seems like the only change needed is the omission of stable. If so, no 
> changes need. I can take care of that when sending on to netdev.

I missed this comment [1] when I responded; I can make this change though.

Thanks,
Tony

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/9ddf6293-6cb0-47ea-a0e7-cad7d33c2535@intel.com/T/#m47dd425fb4de4c1738839c2f8253ec51718d299e