lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250307231041.GA2911050@ax162>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 00:10:41 +0100
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hardening: Enable i386 FORTIFY_SOURCE on Clang 16+

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 02:57:06PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> 
> On March 7, 2025 1:47:34 PM PST, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 09:50:44AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 13:49:37 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> > The i386 regparm bug exposed with FORTIFY_SOURCE with Clang was fixed
> >> > in Clang 16[1].
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!
> >> 
> >> [1/1] hardening: Enable i386 FORTIFY_SOURCE on Clang 16+
> >>       https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/3e5820429980
> >
> >Turns out this is actually incomplete based on my testing, I see the
> >following warnings with ARCH=i386 allmodconfig with all supported clang
> >versions:
> >
> >  warning: unsafe strcpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-strcpy-lit.c
> >  warning: unsafe strcpy() usage lacked '__write_overflow' symbol in lib/test_fortify/write_overflow-strcpy.c
> >
> >We also need to drop '-ffreestanding' from arch/x86/Makefile (which Nick
> >has mentioned in [1]). Time to revive [2]? :) or just do it in this
> >patch, since it sounds like there was no regression with GCC?
> >
> >[1]: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1583#issuecomment-1123016466
> >[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/20200817220212.338670-5-ndesaulniers@google.com/
> 
> Oh good catch! Probably I need to do this in two patches just to be safe:
> - make -ffreestanding be Clang only
> - switch to version checks for FORTIFY and freestanding
> 
> That will split the changes for GCC and Clang into separate patches. Or maybe that's overkill?

No, I think that is reasonable, as any regressions with GCC would be
noticed by the first change, rather than being mixed in with the second.
It should also make it easier to drop that when the minimum version of
clang gets bumped to 16 (either for the whole kernel or just x86, like
the bump to 15 this dev cycle for the recent stack protector fixes in
-top).

Cheers,
Nathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ