[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yduqbthmtpc5e2n4u73ofbp326chk3qdkgdiyrgmwcbhgeqceq@yybbkifwt4zk>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:12:35 -0800
From: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@...rr.cc>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ubsan/overflow: Enable pattern exclusions
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:19:10PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> To make integer wrap-around mitigation actually useful, the associated
> sanitizers must not instrument cases where the wrap-around is explicitly
> defined (e.g. "-2UL"), being tested for (e.g. "if (a + b < a)"), or
> where it has no impact on code flow (e.g. "while (var--)"). Enable
> pattern exclusions for the integer wrap sanitizers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
> ---
> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
> Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.ubsan | 1 +
> scripts/Makefile.ubsan | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> index 63e5622010e0..888c2e72c586 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ config UBSAN_INTEGER_WRAP
> bool "Perform checking for integer arithmetic wrap-around"
> default UBSAN
> depends on !COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on $(cc-option,-fsanitize-undefined-ignore-overflow-pattern=all)
This option group "all" may be expanded in the future, e.g., negations
of unsigned integers (not just unsigned integer literals). As these are
deliberately designed for the kernel, I think we will want them anyways.
So, all is good.
> depends on $(cc-option,-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow)
> depends on $(cc-option,-fsanitize=unsigned-integer-overflow)
> depends on $(cc-option,-fsanitize=implicit-signed-integer-truncation)
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
> index 4fad9afed24c..233379c193a7 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ ubsan-cflags-$(CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP) += $(call cc-option,-fsanitize-trap=undefined
> export CFLAGS_UBSAN := $(ubsan-cflags-y)
>
> ubsan-integer-wrap-cflags-$(CONFIG_UBSAN_INTEGER_WRAP) += \
> + -fsanitize-undefined-ignore-overflow-pattern=all \
> -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow \
> -fsanitize=unsigned-integer-overflow \
> -fsanitize=implicit-signed-integer-truncation \
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Justin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists