[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8qKStnfCBvSw_yI@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 07:55:22 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
ardb@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, peterhuewe@....de,
jgg@...pe.ca, luto@...capital.net, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, corbet@....net,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 07/19] x86/msr: Add variable MTRR base/mask and
x2apic ID registers
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:42:04AM -0800, Ross Philipson wrote:
> These values are needed by Secure Launch to locate particular CPUs
> during AP startup and to restore the MTRR state after a TXT launch.
Hmm... does the first part with like locating particular CPU cores?
I'd start also the sentence with the action taken except assuring
why the undefined action is taken.
"Add the MSR values required by Secure Launch (SL) to locate particular
CPU cores during application processor (AP) startup, and restore the
MTRR state after a Intel TXT launch."
Along the lines would be more informative...
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists