[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHgNfTxS1Q4PPsw520-J4Yn6xg+QZOYFkYhg5yv-uZFu5waN_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:18:31 +1000
From: James Calligeros <jcalligeros99@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>,
Kevin Lu <kevin-lu@...com>, Baojun Xu <baojun.xu@...com>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shi Fu <shifu0704@...ndersoft.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/20] ASoC: dt-bindings: tas2770: add flags for SDOUT
pulldown and zero-fill
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 11:22 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> This just feels like something common because any TDM interface may need
> to control this. It's not really a property of the chip, but requirement
> of the TDM interface.
What I'm imagining then is something like:
dai-link@0 {
cpu {
sound-dai = <&some_cpu>;
};
codec {
sound-dai = <&some_codec>;
dai-tdm-tx-zerofill;
dai-tdm-tx-pulldown; /* either or, having both makes no sense */
};
};
Codec drivers would then provide a function to set TDM TX behaviour if they
support it, and export that as a dai op for use by machine drivers
when they parse
the dai link similar to dai-tdm-tx-slot and friends. Is that close to
what you have
in mind?
Regards,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists