lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8q9l0vDTLpbo8UR@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:34:15 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Balance device refcount when
 destroying devices

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:54:47PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Using device_find_child() to lookup the proper SCMI device to destroy
> causes an unbalance in device refcount, since device_find_child() calls an
> implicit get_device(): this, in turns, inhibits the call of the provided
> release methods upon devices destruction.
> 
> As a consequence, one of the structures that is not freed properly upon
> destruction is the internal struct device_private dev->p populated by the
> drivers subsystem core.
> 
> KMemleak detects this situation since loading/unloding some SCMI driver
> causes related devices to be created/destroyed without calling any
> device_release method.
> 
> unreferenced object 0xffff00000f583800 (size 512):
>   comm "insmod", pid 227, jiffies 4294912190
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00  .....N..........
>     ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 60 36 1d 8a 00 80 ff ff  ........`6......
>   backtrace (crc 114e2eed):
>     kmemleak_alloc+0xbc/0xd8
>     __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x2dc/0x398
>     device_add+0x954/0x12d0
>     device_register+0x28/0x40
>     __scmi_device_create.part.0+0x1bc/0x380
>     scmi_device_create+0x2d0/0x390
>     scmi_create_protocol_devices+0x74/0xf8
>     scmi_device_request_notifier+0x1f8/0x2a8
>     notifier_call_chain+0x110/0x3b0
>     blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x70/0xb0
>     scmi_driver_register+0x350/0x7f0
>     0xffff80000a3b3038
>     do_one_initcall+0x12c/0x730
>     do_init_module+0x1dc/0x640
>     load_module+0x4b20/0x5b70
>     init_module_from_file+0xec/0x158
> 
> $ ./scripts/faddr2line ./vmlinux device_add+0x954/0x12d0
> device_add+0x954/0x12d0:
> kmalloc_noprof at include/linux/slab.h:901
> (inlined by) kzalloc_noprof at include/linux/slab.h:1037
> (inlined by) device_private_init at drivers/base/core.c:3510
> (inlined by) device_add at drivers/base/core.c:3561
> 
> Balance device refcount by issuing a put_device() on devices found via
> device_find_child().
> 
> Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/Z8nK3uFkspy61yjP@arm.com/T/#mc1f73a0ea5e41014fa145147b7b839fc988ada8f
> CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Fixes: d4f9dddd21f3 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add dynamic scmi devices creation")
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>

I was not able to reproduce the memory leak after applying this patch.

Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ