[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8rBGHK9Tjx7D1D2@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:49:12 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Gerald Loacker <gerald.loacker@...fvision.net>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paulk@...-base.io>,
Alexander Shiyan <eagle.alexander923@...il.com>,
Val Packett <val@...kett.cool>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/11] media: dt-bindings: media: add bindings for
rockchip rk3568 vicap
Hi Krzysztof, Michael,
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:51:54AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:56:04PM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
> > Add documentation for the Rockchip RK3568 Video Capture (VICAP) unit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
>
> subject: only one media prefix, the first
>
> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
> See also:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/media/rockchip,rk3568-vicap.yaml | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+)
> >
>
> ...
>
> > + clocks:
> > + items:
> > + - description: ACLK
> > + - description: HCLK
> > + - description: DCLK
> > + - description: ICLK
> > +
> > + clock-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: aclk
> > + - const: hclk
> > + - const: dclk
> > + - const: iclk
> > +
> > + rockchip,cif-clk-delaynum:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > + minimum: 0
> > + maximum: 127
> > + description:
> > + Delay the DVP path clock input to align the sampling phase, only valid
> > + in dual edge sampling mode. Delay is zero by default and can be adjusted
> > + optionally.
>
> default: 0
And this is technically specific to the DVP port (0). Should (or could?) it
be located there?
>
> > +
> > + iommus:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + resets:
> > + items:
> > + - description: ARST
> > + - description: HRST
> > + - description: DRST
> > + - description: PRST
> > + - description: IRST
> > +
> > + reset-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: arst
> > + - const: hrst
> > + - const: drst
> > + - const: prst
> > + - const: irst
> > +
> > + rockchip,grf:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > + description: Phandle to general register file used for video input block control.
> > +
> > + power-domains:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + ports:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + port@0:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > + description: The digital video port (DVP, a parallel video interface).
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + endpoint:
> > + $ref: video-interfaces.yaml#
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + bus-type:
> > + enum: [5, 6]
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - bus-type
> > +
> > + port@1:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > + description: Internal port connected to a MIPI CSI-2 host.
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + endpoint:
> > + $ref: video-interfaces.yaml#
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> Hm, does it actually work? graph/port does not allow any other
> properties. You should use graph/port-base and probably still narrow
> lanes for both of port@0 and port@1.
I'd list the relevant properties for both DVP and CSI-2, either as
mandatory or with defaults (could be reasonable for DVP signal polarities
but not e.g. on number of CSI-2 lanes).
>
>
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - interrupts
> > + - clocks
> > + - ports
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/rk3568-cru.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3568-power.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/media/video-interfaces.h>
> > +
> > + parent {
>
> soc {
>
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists