[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AS8PR04MB86425B7CEE7443F822A2DBCA87D52@AS8PR04MB8642.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:02:14 +0000
From: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC: "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>, "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org"
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, "lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, "james.morse@....com"
<james.morse@....com>, "d-gole@...com" <d-gole@...com>, "anup@...infault.org"
<anup@...infault.org>, "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, "aou@...s.berkeley.edu"
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev"
<imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "khilman@...libre.com" <khilman@...libre.com>,
"quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com" <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
"quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com" <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] cpuidle: Init cpuidle only for present CPUs
Hi Sudeep,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cpuidle: Init cpuidle only for present CPUs
>
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:03:03PM +0800, Jacky Bai wrote:
> > for_each_possible_cpu() is currently used to initialize cpuidle in
> > below cpuidle drivers:
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-big_little.c
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> >
> > However, in cpu_dev_register_generic(), for_each_present_cpu() is used
> > to register CPU devices which means the CPU devices are only
> > registered for present CPUs and not all possible CPUs.
> >
> > With nosmp or maxcpus=0, only the boot CPU is present, lead to the
> > failure:
> >
> > | Failed to register cpuidle device for cpu1
> >
> > Then rollback to cancel all CPUs' cpuidle registration.
> >
> > Change for_each_possible_cpu() to for_each_present_cpu() in the above
> > cpuidle drivers to ensure it only registers cpuidle devices for CPUs
> > that are actually present.
> >
> > Fixes: b0c69e1214bc ("drivers: base: Use present CPUs in
> > GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES")
> > Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
> > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> > Tested-by: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>
> > ---
> > - v4 changes:
> > - add changes for other cpuidle driver that has the similar issue
> > as cpuidle-pcsi driver.
> >
> > - v3 changes:
> > - improve the changelog as suggested by Sudeep
> > ---
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 8 ++++----
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-big_little.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 4 ++--
>
>
> Why have you spared drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c ? IIUC the issue
> exists there as well.
>
For qcom-spm driver, it has below code logic to handle no cpu device case, and
no rollback to cancel the whole cpuidle registration. So I just leave it as it is.
Do we need to update it?
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
ret = spm_cpuidle_register(&pdev->dev, cpu);
if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev,
"Cannot register for CPU%d: %d\n", cpu, ret);
}
}
BR
Jacky Bai
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists