[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8rIVQV0GYqGUYbh@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:20:05 +0100
From: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...il.com>, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
robin.murphy@....com, daniel.almeida@...labora.com,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, airlied@...hat.com,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] rust: add dma coherent allocator abstraction.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:34:21PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:18:18PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:54:14PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > (For some reason, when replying to this mail, mutt removed Sima from To: and
> > > instead switched Cc: to To:, hence resending.)
> >
> > It is normal, Simona's mail client is setup to do that.
>
> Huh! Never noticed that in the past.
>
> >
> > > > I think for basic driver allocations that you just need to run the device
> > > > stuffing it all into devres is ok.
> > >
> > > What exactly do you mean with that? DMA memory allocations or "normal" memory
> > > allocations?
> >
> > Simona means things like a coherent allocation backing something
> > allocated once like a global queue for talking to the device.
>
> Yeah, that's what I propose then.
>
> >
> > Ie DMA API usage that is not on the performance path.
> >
> > > > But for dma mappings at runtime this will be too slow.
> > >
> > > What exactly do you mean with "DMA mappings at runtime"? What to you think is
> > > is slow in this aspect?
> >
> > Things like dma_map_sg(), dma_map_page(), etc, etc.
> >
> > You cannot propose to add any runtime overhead to those paths and get
> > any support from the kernel community. They are performance paths
> > optimized to be fast.
>
> Oh, I didn't do that. How could I, since I did not knew what was referred
> to? :-)
>
> Quite the opposite, I fully agree with that.
>
> I think for this we need higher level abstraction (which now that I know what
> was meant I know Sima proposed already), or maybe provide an API that can
> consolidate single operations for a single Devres container, etc.
Apologies for creating a confusion here, and thanks for Jason for
explaining what I really meant :-)
> But that's out of scope for this series.
Yeah I think for coherent allocations we can get away for now by making
sure you can only get it in safe rust code wrapped in a DevRes. I think
that's solid enough, everything else is for later.
-Sima
--
Simona Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists