[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250307-net-next-mptcp-pm-reorg-v1-5-abef20ada03b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:21:49 +0100
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 05/15] mptcp: pm: remove '_nl' from
mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received
Currently, in-kernel PM specific helpers are prefixed with
'mptcp_pm_nl_'. But here 'mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received' is not specific
to this PM: it is called from the PM worker, and used by both the
in-kernel and userspace PMs. The helper has been renamed to
'mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv' instead of '_received' to avoid confusions with
the one from pm.c.
mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow', and 'mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received'
have been updated too for the same reason.
To avoid confusions, the '_nl' bit has been removed from the name.
While at it, the in-kernel PM specific code has been move from
mptcp_pm_rm_addr_or_subflow to a new dedicated helper, clearer.
No behavioural changes intended.
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index f6f7ea25640b7f0f71fc6cc3217ea278e15a4c13..09ef3aa025e7094392badfcc24a964c0a530ca5d 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -838,9 +838,20 @@ int mptcp_pm_mp_prio_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
return -EINVAL;
}
-static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
- const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list,
- enum linux_mptcp_mib_field rm_type)
+static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u8 rm_id)
+{
+ if (rm_id && WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)) {
+ /* Note: if the subflow has been closed before, this
+ * add_addr_accepted counter will not be decremented.
+ */
+ if (--msk->pm.add_addr_accepted < mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(msk))
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
+ }
+}
+
+static void mptcp_pm_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
+ const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list,
+ enum linux_mptcp_mib_field rm_type)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *tmp;
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
@@ -893,35 +904,23 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type);
}
- if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR)
+ if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) {
__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type);
-
- if (!removed)
- continue;
-
- if (!mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk))
- continue;
-
- if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR && rm_id &&
- !WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)) {
- /* Note: if the subflow has been closed before, this
- * add_addr_accepted counter will not be decremented.
- */
- if (--msk->pm.add_addr_accepted < mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(msk))
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
+ if (removed && mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk))
+ mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr(msk, rm_id);
}
}
}
-static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+static void mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
- mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, &msk->pm.rm_list_rx, MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR);
+ mptcp_pm_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, &msk->pm.rm_list_rx, MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR);
}
-static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
- const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
+static void mptcp_pm_rm_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
+ const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
{
- mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, rm_list, MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW);
+ mptcp_pm_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, rm_list, MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW);
}
void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
@@ -946,7 +945,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
}
if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED);
- mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received(msk);
+ mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv(msk);
}
if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ESTABLISHED)) {
pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ESTABLISHED);
@@ -1538,7 +1537,7 @@ static int mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr(struct net *net,
list.ids[0] = mptcp_endp_get_local_id(msk, addr);
if (remove_subflow) {
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, &list);
+ mptcp_pm_rm_subflow(msk, &list);
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
}
@@ -1583,7 +1582,7 @@ static int mptcp_nl_remove_id_zero_address(struct net *net,
lock_sock(sk);
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
mptcp_pm_remove_addr(msk, &list);
- mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, &list);
+ mptcp_pm_rm_subflow(msk, &list);
__mark_subflow_endp_available(msk, 0);
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
release_sock(sk);
@@ -1670,7 +1669,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_flush_addrs_and_subflows(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
mptcp_pm_remove_addr(msk, &alist);
}
if (slist.nr)
- mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, &slist);
+ mptcp_pm_rm_subflow(msk, &slist);
/* Reset counters: maybe some subflows have been removed before */
bitmap_fill(msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1);
msk->pm.local_addr_used = 0;
@@ -1910,7 +1909,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_fullmesh(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
list.ids[list.nr++] = mptcp_endp_get_local_id(msk, addr);
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, &list);
+ mptcp_pm_rm_subflow(msk, &list);
__mark_subflow_endp_available(msk, list.ids[0]);
mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(msk);
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists