linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next 07/15] mptcp: pm: remove '_nl' from mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250307-net-next-mptcp-pm-reorg-v1-7-abef20ada03b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:21:51 +0100
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>, 
 Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/15] mptcp: pm: remove '_nl' from
 mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr

Currently, in-kernel PM specific helpers are prefixed with
'mptcp_pm_nl_'. But here 'mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr' is not
specific to this PM: it is called from pm.c for both the in-kernel and
userspace PMs.

To avoid confusions, the '_nl' bit has been removed from the name.

No behavioural changes intended.

Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm.c         | 2 +-
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 4 ++--
 net/mptcp/protocol.h   | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index 14c7ff5c606c4ad4b12ff5cbe96c1f2426fbd9c9..ab443b9f9c5f28e34791fa75ce42ee013ed70d78 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const struct sock *ssk,
 			__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDRDROP);
 		}
 	/* id0 should not have a different address */
-	} else if ((addr->id == 0 && !mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(msk, addr)) ||
+	} else if ((addr->id == 0 && !mptcp_pm_is_init_remote_addr(msk, addr)) ||
 		   (addr->id > 0 && !READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr))) {
 		mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, addr, true);
 		mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 43667ad4c4aeb6eb018d18849ff14b600a21816f..029a74162b0bce0d3f34f0aeb854ef1b99c020dd 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -772,8 +772,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	}
 }
 
-bool mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
-				     const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote)
+bool mptcp_pm_is_init_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
+				  const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote)
 {
 	struct mptcp_addr_info mpc_remote;
 
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index a5db1a297fbca84249c89757ed0001d01bcff169..39bcad1def6bc97a3eca91f5c409b50c8fa2cd8e 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -1006,8 +1006,8 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const struct sock *ssk,
 void mptcp_pm_add_addr_echoed(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 			      const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr);
 void mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
-bool mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
-				     const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote);
+bool mptcp_pm_is_init_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
+				  const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote);
 void mptcp_pm_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 void mptcp_pm_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 			       const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list);

-- 
2.48.1