linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: Add flags to kvm_hyp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z8rZ8bBnSllaZCEs@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:35:13 +0000
From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Cc: maz@...nel.org, joey.gouly@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
	yuzenghui@...wei.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
	qperret@...gle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: Add flags to kvm_hyp_memcache

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:20:00PM -0800, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 01:43:44PM +0000, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > Add flags to kvm_hyp_memcache and propagate them up to the allocation
> > and free callbacks. This will later allow to account for memory, based
> > on the memcache configuration.
> 
> It seems slightly more obvious to me if we pass a pointer to the
> memcache instead, but that's just a minor nit.

That sounds good!

> 
> Unless you have a preference on this, I can change it when I apply the
> patch.

I have just sent a v3 to save you the trouble.

> 
> Thanks,
> Oliver