lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8uLMtcrWNMPqFrc@boqun-archlinux>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:11:30 -0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	"open list:RUST:Keyword:b(?i:rust)b" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH locking 00/11] LOCKDEP and Rust locking changes for v6.15

On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[...]
> > > I've applied these 3 patches to the tip:locking/urgent tree:
> > > 
> > >   locking/semaphore: Use wake_q to wake up processes outside lock critical section
> > >   locking/rtmutex: Use the 'struct' keyword in kernel-doc comment
> > >   rust: lockdep: Remove support for dynamically allocated LockClassKeys
> > > 
> > > As a general rule, if a patch is marked Cc: stable, it must also be 
> > > applied to current upstream.
> > > 
> > 
> > Do you prefer a separate pull request for the future? I can send one for
> > urgent and one for locking/core.
> 
> One tree is fine - maybe indicate which ones are urgent material and 
> keep them at the head of the tree?
> 

Sounds good to me, will do.

Regards,
Boqun

> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ