[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87senn3dh1.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:37:30 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>, Paul Walmsley
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Huacai
Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, Peter
Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] entry: Inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode()
On Wed, Mar 05 2025 at 16:43, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Architectures using the generic entry code can be optimized by having
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode inlined.
That's a pretty handwavy claim. What's the actual benefit in numbers?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists