lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <174144149867.14745.14169155050003508900.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:44:58 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Anna-Maria Behnsen" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Anna-Maria Behnsen" <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
 Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
 [tip: timers/vdso] x86/vdso: Prepare introduction of struct vdso_clock

The following commit has been merged into the timers/vdso branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     bf0eff816e467f8decb9b3ac0218cc26060e359f
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/bf0eff816e467f8decb9b3ac0218cc26060e359f
Author:        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 03 Mar 2025 12:11:17 +01:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 14:37:41 +01:00

x86/vdso: Prepare introduction of struct vdso_clock

To support multiple PTP clocks, the VDSO data structure needs to be
reworked. All clock specific data will end up in struct vdso_clock and in
struct vdso_time_data there will be array of VDSO clocks. At the moment,
vdso_clock is simply a define which maps vdso_clock to vdso_time_data.

To prepare for the rework of the data structures, replace the struct
vdso_time_data pointer with a struct vdso_clock pointer where applicable.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250303-vdso-clock-v1-15-c1b5c69a166f@linutronix.de

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
index edec796..9e52cc4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static inline u64 __arch_get_hw_counter(s32 clock_mode,
 	return U64_MAX;
 }
 
-static inline bool arch_vdso_clocksource_ok(const struct vdso_time_data *vd)
+static inline bool arch_vdso_clocksource_ok(const struct vdso_clock *vc)
 {
 	return true;
 }
@@ -300,34 +300,34 @@ static inline bool arch_vdso_cycles_ok(u64 cycles)
  * declares everything with the MSB/Sign-bit set as invalid. Therefore the
  * effective mask is S64_MAX.
  */
-static __always_inline u64 vdso_calc_ns(const struct vdso_time_data *vd, u64 cycles, u64 base)
+static __always_inline u64 vdso_calc_ns(const struct vdso_clock *vc, u64 cycles, u64 base)
 {
-	u64 delta = cycles - vd->cycle_last;
+	u64 delta = cycles - vc->cycle_last;
 
 	/*
 	 * Negative motion and deltas which can cause multiplication
 	 * overflow require special treatment. This check covers both as
-	 * negative motion is guaranteed to be greater than @vd::max_cycles
+	 * negative motion is guaranteed to be greater than @vc::max_cycles
 	 * due to unsigned comparison.
 	 *
 	 * Due to the MSB/Sign-bit being used as invalid marker (see
 	 * arch_vdso_cycles_ok() above), the effective mask is S64_MAX, but that
 	 * case is also unlikely and will also take the unlikely path here.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(delta > vd->max_cycles)) {
+	if (unlikely(delta > vc->max_cycles)) {
 		/*
 		 * Due to the above mentioned TSC wobbles, filter out
 		 * negative motion.  Per the above masking, the effective
 		 * sign bit is now bit 62.
 		 */
 		if (delta & (1ULL << 62))
-			return base >> vd->shift;
+			return base >> vc->shift;
 
 		/* Handle multiplication overflow gracefully */
-		return mul_u64_u32_add_u64_shr(delta & S64_MAX, vd->mult, base, vd->shift);
+		return mul_u64_u32_add_u64_shr(delta & S64_MAX, vc->mult, base, vc->shift);
 	}
 
-	return ((delta * vd->mult) + base) >> vd->shift;
+	return ((delta * vc->mult) + base) >> vc->shift;
 }
 #define vdso_calc_ns vdso_calc_ns
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ