linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] staging: Add driver to communicate with the T2 Security Chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <PN3PR01MB95970E60B250F91CA8E12720B8D72@PN3PR01MB9597.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:52:43 +0000
From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "joro@...tes.org"
	<joro@...tes.org>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
	"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
	"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>, Linux Kernel
 Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
	Aun-Ali Zaidi <admin@...eit.net>, "paul@...rm.io" <paul@...rm.io>, Orlando
 Chamberlain <orlandoch.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] staging: Add driver to communicate with the T2
 Security Chip



> On 9 Mar 2025, at 3:21 PM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 09:41:29AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> On 9 Mar 2025, at 3:09 PM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 09:28:01AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>> On 9 Mar 2025, at 2:46 PM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 09:03:29AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 9 Mar 2025, at 2:24 PM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 08:40:31AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Paul Pawlowski <paul@...rm.io>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This patch adds a driver named apple-bce, to add support for the T2
>>>>>>>> Security Chip found on certain Macs.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The driver has 3 main components:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> BCE (Buffer Copy Engine) - this is what the files in the root directory
>>>>>>>> are for. This estabilishes a basic communication channel with the T2.
>>>>>>>> VHCI and Audio both require this component.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So this is a new "bus" type?  Or a platform resource?  Or something
>>>>>>> else?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's a PCI device
>>>>> 
>>>>> Great, but then is the resources split up into smaller drivers that then
>>>>> bind to it?  How does the other devices talk to this?
>>>> 
>>>> We technically can split up these 3 into separate drivers and put then into their own trees.
>>> 
>>> That's fine, but you say that the bce code is used by the other drivers,
>>> right?  So there is some sort of "tie" between these, and that needs to
>>> be properly conveyed in the device tree in sysfs as that will be
>>> required for proper resource management.
>> 
>> Yes there needs to be a tie, basically first establish a communication with the t2 using bce and then the other 2 come into the picture. I did get a basic idea from what the maintainers want, and this will be some work to do. Thanks for your inputs!
> 
> If there is "communication" then that's a bus in the driver model
> scheme, so just use that, right?

So basically RE the whole driver to see what exactly should be use?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h