[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25e29571-6b96-49cc-aa72-e3040fde8004@web.de>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 11:00:15 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: reorder pointer operations after sanity
checks to avoid NULL deref
…
> Fix this by reordering the dereference after the sanity checks.
Another wording suggestion:
Thus move the assignment of the variable “dpu_enc” behind a null pointer check.
Would an other summary phrase be nicer?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists