lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <104b6d4f-2848-42f4-a134-3373d12d9424@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:33:08 +0100
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
 "Alexey Gladkov (Intel)" <alexey.gladkov@...el.com>,
 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
 Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Larry.Dewey@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Make SEV_STATUS available via SYSFS

On 10.03.25 16:11, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:50:09PM +0100, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
>> Am I understand correctly that you and Joerg are proposing
>>
>> /sys/guest/tdx/...
>> /sys/guest/sev/...
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Which path to use for the host side ?
>>
>> For guest: /sys/coco/guest/{tdx,sev}/...
>> For host:  /sys/coco/host/{tdx,sev}/...
>>
>> Maybe it would be better to add the "coco" subdirectory or something like
>> that ?
> 
> Hmm, so we can do
> 
> /sys/guest
> 
> and extend
> 
> /sys/hypervisor
> 
> Or we can do what you're suggesting.
> 
> If we do /sys/coco/host, then we'll have two different places to read HV info.
> 
> Or we can stick *everything* coco needs in
> 
> /sys/coco/{sev,tdx}
> 
> but then it is coco-specific and if other guest types want to put stuff in
> sysfs, it'll get ugly.
> 
> So I guess having
> 
> /sys/guest
> and
> /sys/hypervisor
> 
> kinda keeps it all clean, hierarchy-wise...
> 
> Right?

Kind of.

/sys/hypervisor is meant to provide data for running under a hypervisor.

It is NOT meant to provide data for running as a hypervisor.

So far when running either under Xen or under z/VM /sys/hypervisor is being
populated.

I'm not feeling really strong here. I just want to state the status quo.


Juergen

Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3684 bytes)

Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ