[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2qwqacogz5vzfekhk5276owld6isgewu5a2iw3roag3lbtsgm@67vqf54c5tdh>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:12:41 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>, Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Makoto Sato <makoto.sato@...ark-techno.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: freescale: fsl-samsung-hdmi: return closest rate
instead LUT
Hello Dominique,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 06:48:50PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> [...] and I'm sure there are other improvements that could be made at
> the edges.
One thing that irritated me is the function names. `phy_clk_round_rate`
sounds too generic. `fsl_samsung_hdmi_phy_clk_round_rate` is long, but
I'd say would be a better match.
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists