[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d195bf7-de99-4fe9-87b0-291e156f083c@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:23:02 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: assert that dummy regulator has been
probed before using it
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 05:33:02PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> Due to asynchronous driver probing there is a chance that the dummy
> regulator hasn't already been probed when first accessing it.
> if (have_full_constraints()) {
> r = dummy_regulator_rdev;
> + BUG_ON(!r);
> get_device(&r->dev);
> } else {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to resolve %s-supply for %s\n",
> @@ -2086,6 +2087,7 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> goto out;
> }
> r = dummy_regulator_rdev;
> + BUG_ON(!r);
This doesn't actually help anything - I'd expect this to trigger probe
deferral.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists