linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc changes for v6.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c9537841-b4b1-4dfa-b673-7a2d46755a89@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:55:31 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc changes for v6.15

On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 07:22:35PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2025-03-10 10:09:49-0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 02:06:21PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit 2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b:
> > > 
> > >   Linux 6.14-rc1 (2025-02-02 15:39:26 -0800)
> > > 
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > 
> > >   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20250308-for-6.15-1
> > > 
> > > for you to fetch changes up to bceb73904c855c78402dca94c82915f078f259dd:
> > > 
> > >   tools/nolibc: don't use asm/ UAPI headers (2025-03-08 13:18:27 +0100)
> > 
> > Thank you, I have pulled this in and will expose it to -next testing.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > Results from "make run":
> > 
> > 198 test(s): 198 passed,   0 skipped,   0 failed => status: success
> > 
> > Results from "make user":
> > 
> > 198 test(s): 196 passed,   2 skipped,   0 failed => status: warning
> > 
> > I don't understand the "warning" given that the "run.out" file has all
> > "OK" aside from the two "SKIPPED" tests.  Or maybe I am just forgetting
> > how this works.  ;-)
> 
> A skipped test will mark the whole run as "warning".

Ah, never mind, me being forgetful!

							Thanx, Paul

> Maybe we'll adopt the kselftest harness at some point and align with the
> rest of the selftests.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> 
> Thomas