linux-kernel - Re: [morse:mpam/move_to_fs/v7_bare] [x86/resctrl] 0021800a46: will-it-scale.per_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6cd8d37e-19bd-4fb8-8b91-e5b2c5f6f7e7@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:17:51 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, James Morse
	<james.morse@....com>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, Shaopeng Tan
	<tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [morse:mpam/move_to_fs/v7_bare] [x86/resctrl] 0021800a46:
 will-it-scale.per_process_ops 18.4% improvement

Hi,

On 3/10/25 7:06 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed a 18.4% improvement of will-it-scale.per_process_ops on:
> 
> 
> commit: 0021800a465d495a536265c52f8a031da43948ed ("x86/resctrl: Use schema type to determine the schema format string")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git mpam/move_to_fs/v7_bare
> 
> testcase: will-it-scale
> config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
> compiler: gcc-12
> test machine: 224 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480CTDX (Sapphire Rapids) with 512G memory
> parameters:
> 
> 	nr_task: 100%
> 	mode: process
> 	test: signal1
> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
> 
> 
> In addition to that, the commit also has significant impact on the following tests:
> 
> +------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | testcase: change | stress-ng: stress-ng.usersyscall.ops_per_sec 18.0% improvement                              |
> | test machine     | 224 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480CTDX (Sapphire Rapids) with 512G memory |
> | test parameters  | cpufreq_governor=performance                                                                |
> |                  | nr_threads=100%                                                                             |
> |                  | test=usersyscall                                                                            |
> |                  | testtime=60s                                                                                |
> +------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Details are as below:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
> 
> 
> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250310/202503102156.d70c4800-lkp@intel.com
> 
> =========================================================================================
> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
>   gcc-12/performance/x86_64-rhel-9.4/process/100%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-spr-2sp4/signal1/will-it-scale
> 
> commit: 
>   a13ae432a6 ("x86/resctrl: Use schema type to determine how to parse schema values")
>   0021800a46 ("x86/resctrl: Use schema type to determine the schema format string")
> 

It is surprising to me that these commits make a difference in these workloads. I searched around for resctrl in
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests but is seems as though it runs the resctrl selftests only and do not
use resctrl as part of any tests reported here. From what I understand, by not even mounting resctrl, these tests
(a) do not exercise these code paths, and (b) do not use resctrl to control resources allocated for these workloads. 

Reinette