[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250310235831.GL2023217@ZenIV>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:58:31 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+019072ad24ab1d948228@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
jk@...abs.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [efi?] [fs?] possible deadlock in efivarfs_actor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 07:21:53PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The repro log also has
>
> program crashed: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in
> efivarfs_pm_notify
>
> preceding the other log output regarding the locks, so the deadlock
> might be a symptom of another problem.
This:
struct path path = { .mnt = NULL, .dentry = sfi->sb->s_root, };
_What_ .mnt = NULL? That's already a bug. There is no such thing
as mountless open file; how would the kernel know not to shut the
damn thing down right under you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists