linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/13] dt-bindings: clock: airoha: make reg optional for Airoha EN7581

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250310-pompous-elk-of-serendipity-cfebc9@krzk-bin>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 09:06:04 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, 
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Daniel Danzberger <dd@...edd.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>, 
	Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>, 
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] dt-bindings: clock: airoha: make reg optional for
 Airoha EN7581

On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 02:29:37PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> The Airoha EN7581 clock-controller registers are placed in the SCU

I don't understand. The registers moved?

> (System Controller Unit). Now that additional pheriperals are supported
> for the SCU, a dedicated SCU node is created and the clock-controller is
> moved as a child of such node hence the register property is taken from
> the parent node.
> 
> To support this, make the reg property optional and provide an
> additional example for this case.

No, post complete binding instead of adding some sort of stubs and then
later totally reworking them to match different Linux drivers.

Best regards,
Krzysztof