[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z86ilQqOn-fgVsiL@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:28:05 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, nnac123@...ux.ibm.com,
horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 1/8] test_hexdump: Change rowsize and groupsize to
size_t
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 09:34:45AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Both refer to positive values, size_t matches the other parameters.
But why? The original code is written to mimic the parameters of
the hexdump_to_buffer().
You probably want to say that this matches it after your other patch being
applied (which is not yet the case).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists